Mee Jin-Jo wrote:

Judge Richard J. Arcara is ruling the case (Case No. 1:08-cv-0230) pending before US District Court, western New York. He unreasonably ordered Pro-se plaintiff to reserve the summons to save the defendant from the default although the service was proper and sufficient under Rule 4(d). Defendant committed over 14 months laches under Judge Arcara’s favoritism. The defendant again failed to answer within time, so the Clerk’s Entry of Default was entered. However, Judge Arcara issued a Scheduling Order and forced a Pretrial Conference despite the case’s statue is in default. Judge Arcara’s outrageous ruling beyond the rules and law must be stopped. Now a complaint against Judge Arcara is pending before Court of Appeal and a petition is pending before Congress and US Senate. Judge’s prejudice, favoritism based on possible corruption and bribery must not be allowed in the US Court.